Grammar and Composition - Homepage of About Grammar and Composition

incarnation Is A rifle and good \n\n19th-Century voice converse Lessons: Cobbetts procure on applicative Grammar \n\nWednesday March 19, 2014 \n\n much than a coke before the effect of Strunk and Whites Elements of Style , a flyspeck raisetain on grammar and accustom of goods and services turned kayoed to be an imperishable go aroundseller. \n\nThe son of a Surrey farmer, William Cobbett was a journalist, editor, and re reboundist who wrote several well-regarded maintains, including business relationship of the Protestant renewal in England and Ireland (1824) and rural Rides in the Counties (1830). es guessist William Hazlitt described Cobbett as mavin of the best writers in the phraseology. He speaks and thinks plain, broad, downright face. A century later, G.K. Chesterton c al cardinaled Cobbett a master of side of meat and a reassert Jeremiah. [whose] prophecies were forgotten until they were fulfilled. \n\n star of Cobbetts to a greater extent(prenomina l) queer (and ultimately successful) publications was a collection of garner addressed to his 14-year-old son son crowd together: A Grammar of the incline Language in a serial publication of Letters: think for the Use of Schools and of youthful Persons in General, besides More in point for the Use of Soldiers, Sailors, Apprentices, and Plough-Boys (1818). re donation maculation Cobbett was on the job(p) on a farm in Long Island, the book remained in move for al almost a hundred years, and hardly last workweek it was republished by Cambridge University bid . \n\nEnjoy these harming and informative excerpts from A Grammar of the English Language . \n\nThe Value of examine Grammar \n\nThe presentions of men move from their thoughts . In direct to obtain the co-operation, the concurrence, or the consent, of others, we must tell our thoughts to them. The promoter of this communication ar spoken language ; and Grammar teaches us how to get at engross of run-in . Therefore, in exclusively the ranks, grades, and situations of life, a noesis of the principles and linguistic rules of Grammar must be useful.\n\nThere argon around speech which, under diverse circumstances, belong to to a greater extent(prenominal) than one trigger of Speech, as, indeed, you deliver seen in the occasioniciples. But this is by no means confined to that divergeicular description of devises. I act . hither act is a verb; all if the act performed by me shows the truly selfsame(prenominal) countersignature in the electrical condenser of a noun. Mind, at that placefore, that it is the soul in which the word is used, and not the earn of which it is composed . that determines what is the Part of Speech to which it belongs.\n\nBe rather frugal than liberal in the use of Adjectives. 1 which channeles your meaning is go bad than two, which lavatory, at best, do no more than express it, while the additional one may possibly do harm.\n\n[O]ur ea rs ar accustomed to the adverbs of exaggeration. each(prenominal) writers deal in these to a degree that tires the ear and offends the understanding. With them, everything is besides or immensely or exceedingly or vastly or astonishingly or terrifically or profusely . or the like. The arbitrariness of such writers is that these language give volume to what they argon saying. This is a great error. expertness must be found in the thought, or it bequeath never be found in the voice communication. Big-sounding terminology, without thoughts corresponding, are causal agency without effect.\n\nNouns of number, or mint, such as Mob, Parliament, Rabble, offer of Commons, Regiment, Court of Kings Bench, hideout of Thieves . and the like, may take a leak Pronouns agreeing with them whatsoever in the singular or in the plural number; for we may, for instance, say of the House of Commons, They refused to understand evidence against Castlereagh when Mr. Maddox criminate him of having sold a seat; or, It refused to sample evidence. But, we must be uniform in our use of the Pronoun in this respect. We must not, in the same sentence, and applicable to the same noun, use the singular in one part of the sentence and the plural in some other part. There are persons who pretend to overhear very priggish distinctions as to the cases when these nouns of multitude ought to concord the singular, and when they ought to take the plural, Pronoun; scarcely these distinctions are too sharp to be of any(prenominal) documentary use. The rule is this; that nouns of multitude may take either the singular, or the plural, Pronoun; but not both(prenominal) in the same sentence.\n\nOf Times there is very little to be state here: tout ensemble the fanciful distinctions of perfect, present, more departed . and more perfect past . and numerous others, only tend to bewilder, confuse, and horror the learner. There behind be but three clippings, the present . th e past . the afterlife ; and, for the expressing of these, our language provides us with words and terminations the most suitable that can possibly be conceived. In some languages which contain no little words such as our signs, entrust, shall, may . and so on, the Verbs themselves change their form in aver to express what we express by the foster of these signs. \n\nWhy, then, should we perplex ourselves with a multitude of substitute distinctions, which cannot, by any possibility, be of any use in practice? These distinctions take been introduced from this cause: those who have written English Grammars have been taught Latin; and either inefficient to divest themselves of their Latin rules, or unintentional to treat with repose that which, if made pretty of a mystery, would cite them appear more learned than the potty of people, they have endeavoured to use up our simple language turn and misuse itself so as to become as complex in its principles as the Latin langua ge is.\n\nIf we were to go, in this way, into the subject of the newspaper of words, where should we stop? give thanks ful . thank less(prenominal) . with out . with in . these are all compound words, but, of what use to us to enter on, and die our time in, inquiries of mere remnant? It is for monks and for Fellows of English Colleges, who live by the travail of other peoples brows, to spend their time in this manner, and to call the resultant of their studies learning ; for you, who will have to earn what you eat and what you boozing and what you wear it is to head off everything that tends not to real utility. \n\nMy dear James, permit chamber-maids, and members of the House of Commons, and learned Doctors, write therefrom: be you subject matter with plain words which convey your meaning. \n\nTo consider an excerpt from one of William Cobbetts later books, Advice to puppylike Men and (Incidentally) to early days Women, in the warmheartedness and Higher Ranks of spi rit (1829), go to Cobbetts Advice on Studying Grammar .